The Characters Of Frankenstein - 1425 Words

ey’s novel Frankenstein, the conflict between the subordinate character—the monster and the dominant characters—human beings runs through the beginning to the end. The human beings are the dominant power because the society belongs to them and they get to decide who’s accepted and who’s not. The behaviors of the monster tries to get involved to fit in with the human society is a reflection of human being’s dominant power, and thus makes the monster subordinate. It sounds impossible for people in the 19th century to embrace a disfigured monster, despite the fact that he acts like human. Through the novel, it looks like that the mainstream remains its dominant power but in fact the subordinate monster in some way successfully threats its stability. In Frankenstein, human beings’ mainstream power stays dominant and the monster fights to break away from his subordinate identity. However the progress of recognizing his identity is gradual, first is through developing the relationship with nature. The monster comes to the forest soon after he was born, he hears the birds tweeting and his heart is filled with joy, sometime he even tries to imitate the pleasant songs of birds (71). Later he learns to distinguish various kinds of insects and herbs. This is his recognition of the nature. The monster’s mental state at the point is like a child, he regards himself as part of the nature, and he does not realize that he might be â€Å"human†. When he walks into the village, people are panicShow MoreRelatedCharacters in Frankenstein1261 Words   |  6 PagescenterbExamine the way in which characters are portrayed in the novel./b/center br brIn the novel Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley, the characters have been p ortrayed effectively. Much of the interactions between characters, and characteristics of the characters have been based on events which have occurred in Shelley s own life, or they represent what she believes is important. For example, Victor is portrayed as having a strong passion for science, and a poor understanding ofRead MoreFrankenstein Character Analysis831 Words   |  4 Pages The novel Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley, is a gothic novel about a creature that achieves humanity through his emotional feelings and intellectual thoughts. Throughout the novel, Shelly demonstrates that the goodwill of a person dominates his or her overall disposition. The reader feels sympathy for the characters when they suffer through hardships and tragedies because of their redeeming qualities that reflect a positive light on mankind. Shelly develops the novel by portraying the charactersRead MoreFrankenstein as Anti-Hero Character1578 Words   |  7 PagesSUCI HANIFAH LITERARY CRITICISM II EDRIA SANDIKA/MARLIZA YENI 8 MAY 2013 Frankenstein as Anti Hero Character A women who wrote â€Å"Frankenstein† named, Mary Shelley, she was born August 30, 1797, in London, England. Mary Shelley came from a rich literary heritage. She was the daughter of William Godwin, a political theorist, novelist, and publisher. Her ideas to write Frankenstein cameon summer of 1816, Mary and his brother Percy visited the poet Lord Byron at his villa beside Lake Geneva in SwitzerlandRead MorePortrayal of the Characters in Frankenstein Essay1293 Words   |  6 PagesPortrayal of the Characters in Frankenstein      Ã‚   In the novel Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley, the characters have been portrayed effectively. Much of the interactions between characters, and characteristics of the characters have been based on events which have occurred in Shelleys own life, or they represent what she believes is important. For example, Victor is portrayed as having a strong passion for science, and a poor understanding of relationships. Elizabeth is shown as a stereotypicalRead MoreThe Importance Of Minor Characters Of Frankenstein 1656 Words   |  7 PagesRosikga Mohanalingam Mr. McDowell ENG4U1-04 Monday December 8th, 2014 Frankenstein: The Importance of Minor characters Every novel consists of minor characters that may seem to be useless aspects to the story but are actually very important. They have a purpose that helps carry out the main focus of the novel. They may serve as a means of revealing more about major characters as well as to advance or move along the plot. They can be either good or bad, serving as a central part of the storyRead MoreThe Character of the Monster in Frankenstein Essay1847 Words   |  8 PagesExplore the ways Mary Shelley presents the character of the monster in Frankenstein We are prepared for the arrival of the monster in many different ways, before he is created we know the monster is going to be a repulsive figure of a human being, but the reader is still intrigued into reading further, and because of Shelleys descriptive language we already feel disgust towards victors creation, and in doing so, we our-selves become just as callous as those people in the book that neglectRead MoreVictor Frankenstein Character Analysis Essay1645 Words   |  7 PagesMs. Straatsma ENG4U0-A Ryan Makhanlall ISU Reading Analysis Questions/Notes – Frankenstein by: Mary Shelley Character Analysis: Give your ideas about the main characters(s). Include what you like and dislike about the characters and why they deserve praise or criticism. Does the author intend for you to like/dislike them? How do you know? Victor Frankenstein: Victor Frankenstein, is the protagonist who describes his life to Robert Walton. In my opinion, Victor shows his ambition, logic and intelligenceRead MoreEssay on The Role of Female Characters in Frankenstein1459 Words   |  6 PagesCan you imagine Mary Wollstonecraft Shelleys Frankenstein, the great work of literature, without, for example, such female characters as Mrs. Margaret Saville, Elizabeth Lavenza, and Justine Moritz? In this case the novel will have no meaning. All the women help to develop the plot, and without them Frankenstein will lose its spirit. Although these heroines have a lot in common in their characters: they are all strong-willed, kind, careful, and selfless, at the same time, each of them is uniqueRead More Comparison between Characters of Frankenstein Essay1513 Words   |  7 PagesComparison between Characters of Frankenstein      Ã‚  Ã‚   In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley combines three separate stories involving three different characters--Walton, Victor, and Frankensteins monster. Though the reader is hearing the stories through Waltons perspective, Walton strives for accuracy in relating the details, as he says, I have resolved every night,...to record, as nearly as possible in his [Victors] own words, what he has related during the day (Shelley 37). Shelleys shift inRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of Elizabeth Lavenza s Frankenstein 1562 Words   |  7 PagesShelby Guffey English 251 October 2, 2017 Character Analysis of Elizabeth Lavenza in Frankenstein In Mary Shelley’s 1831 novel, Frankenstein, there are several smaller characters that help to move the plot forward. Perhaps the most influential character to Victor Frankenstein’s life is Elizabeth Lavenza, his doomed fiancà ©. By the end of the novel, her character serves as the final tool for Victor Frankenstein to be able to understand his creature. Parallel to the time-period, Elizabeth seems to

Accuracy and precision Free Essays

To learn how to use a balance to weigh objects. 2. To determine the accuracy of various lab glassware as well as the precision obtainable when using each of these. We will write a custom essay sample on Accuracy and precision or any similar topic only for you Order Now II. BACKGROUND: If a person goes into a restaurant and orders a cup of coffee, how much coffee will be given to the person? Will the coffee arrive in a large, earthenware mug or a delicate, china cup? Do all coffee cups hold a cup of coffee? If, on the other hand, another person Is following a recipe that called for a cup of coffee, how much coffee will that person use? Will there be a difference in how the coffee is measured in these two situations? Recording numerical data is an important part of scientific research. The reliability of these data can Influence the conclusions drawn from the experiment. Although â€Å"accuracy and â€Å"precision† are used interchangeably in common speech, in scientific language, they mean two different things. The â€Å"true value† of any number is a philosophical idea which we take as a given/known thing; for example, scientists say that exactly 100. 0000 ml of water weigh exactly 100. 0000 g at 40 C (theoretically 99. 23 g at CHIC – room temperature). An â€Å"error† in data is the numerical deference between the measured value and the true value. An â€Å"accurate† result is one that agrees 100 ml of water, a weight of 100. 001 g is more accurate than 100. 009 g, and that is more accurate than 100. 01 g. â€Å"Precision,† on the other hand, refers to agreement among a group of data, but says nothing about their relationship to the true value. Three measurements of 100. 009, 100. 008, and 100. 007 g might be more precise than three measurements of 100. 009, 100. 002, and 99. 995 g, and yet may not be more accurate. In the above example, which of these methods of measuring coffee is the most accurate? If a measuring cup is used, will that always measure exactly one cup of coffee? Why or why not? What factor(s) could be sources of error in the user’s measurement? Which of these methods of measuring coffee would be the most precise? Why? There is a variety of glassware here in the Biology Lab – beakers, graduated cylinders, Erlenmeyer flasks, volumetric flasks – that could be used for a lab exercise in which students would be required to measure 100 ml of distilled water (dhow). Because these various types of lab glassware are designed for different purposes, their accuracy and precision vary. Certain types of glassware are manufactured with greater precision than other types and/or yield more accurate agreement of volume. Knowledge of the relative accuracy and/or precision of the various types of glassware can aid in determining the appropriateness of a piece of glassware for a desired use. For example, if a student needs several identical 100 ml samples, which measuring utensil should be chosen? Why? When a scientist comes up with an answer to a question like the preceding one that might be right yet needs to be tested to see if it is true, this is called a hypothesis (hypo under, beneath; thesis = an arranging). Any testable answer to the previous question such as, â€Å"l think that the _ glassware is more Once a scientist has formed an hypothesis, it is then necessary to figure out how that hypothesis can be tested. The scientist would need to decide what to do (procedure/methods) and what data are appropriate to gather to uphold or disprove the hypothesis. At times, scientists may end up gathering â€Å"negative† data that actually disprove their hypotheses. For this glassware, what could be done – what steps could be followed – to find out if the _ glassware really is the most precise/accurate? Is it enough to use one piece of glassware or should several kinds/styles be tried? Is it enough to take one reading on each piece of glassware or should several tests/trials be reformed on each piece? If a person places a desired amount of water into a piece of glassware, how will that person know if the container is correctly filled? How will (s)he know the container is filled the same amount every time? When viewed from the side, the surface of the water in a transparent glass container is a characteristic shape that is a clue to solving this dilemma. Because of water’s affinity for glass (glass is hydrophilic, hydro = water, Philip = brotherly love), the edges of the water’s surface will creep up the walls of the container slightly. Especially in small-diameter glassware, the surface of the water is, thus, tactically curved. This curved surface of the water is called a meniscus (Figure 1) (menisci = a crescent). How to cite Accuracy and precision, Papers

Essay on The Triggers Of Madness Hamlet Analysis Essay Example For Students

Essay on The Triggers Of Madness : Hamlet Analysis Essay The Triggers of Madness: Hamlet AnalysisIn Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, there are only two female characters—Ophelia and Gertrude. Both female characters are seen as frail and dependent on men; while, the male characters throughout Hamlet are depicted as independent beings that possess their own power. Hamlet’s interactions with Gertrude, his mother, and Ophelia, his love, are filled with mixed signals of his affections towards each of them. Though the women seem to be insignificant pawns in the world of Hamlet, they are essential to the method of his madness. Without Ophelia and Gertrude Hamlet’s plan of acting mad to seek vengeance for his deceased father would have faltered because it is with Ophelia and Gertrude that the actions of Hamlet become paralleled—when he interacts with them he is a wise, belligerent, fool. Ophelia and Gertrude are the triggers of Hamlet’s seeming madness.Hamlet is a well-educated man. He does not act without thought—he is not impulsive. Everything he does has a purpose. Hamlet knows both Ophelia and Gertrude like the back of his hand and he plays them like fiddle. However, it is the actions of both ladies that cause him to react— using vicious insults to their femininity. When Gertrude remarries the kings brother, Claudius, so quickly after the king being â€Å"but two months dead† Hamlet becomes frustrated; he cannot fathom how hastily Gertrude replaced the throne as well as her loyalty that belonged to Hamlet’s father. It is early in the play we see Hamlet’s perception of women: â€Å"Frailty† is thy name (1.2.138 and 145). The way men perceive their mothers is the way they perceive all women. This notion proves true throughout Hamlet; due to Gertrude’s brash incestuous remarriage, Hamlet perceived his mo. .ss. They misplaced their loyalties altering Hamlets perception of women into sexual pawns in the method of his madness. There are only to women in Hamlet; they are portrayed as weak and insignificant beings that are dependent on men. However, Gertrude and Ophelia are significant because they are the cause and triggers of Hamlet’s madness. Without Gertrude and Ophelia, Hamlet would not be. It is said that the women in Hamlet hold no power, but they do. Their actions and loyalties to other men cause Hamlet to react in a manner in which his views of women are depicted and his madness is evident. It is through his paralleled interactions with both women that we see his madness ignited. Because of Gertrude being â€Å"her husband brothers wife† Hamlet felt betrayed by women—even â€Å"fair† Ophelia (3.4.14). It is the â€Å"frailty† of women the triggers the madness in Hamlet (1.2.145).